In the past comparing and buying auto insurance plans could be a very time consuming and frustrating process, which goes some towards explaining why many people used to simply sign up to the first policy that they came across without even comparing the differences in features and prices before they made any commitment.

These days, however, it has become far easier to compare auto insurance from a wide range of providers thanks the power of the Internet. Using the Internet provides a great tool for people who want to get the best deal on their auto insurance, as it provides so many benefits that people in the past never had access to. There are many reasons why it can be so beneficial to compare your auto insurance online and some of these include:

• Saving a lot of time and hassle: When you compare your auto insurance online you can do so from the comfort and privacy of your own home and at a time that suits you, whether it is night or day. This is great for people who work or have other commitments that make it difficult to contact insurance firms in office hours. It also gives you plenty of time to think about what you want without having to feel pressured into making a quick decision
• Having a great choice of providers: With so many insurance firms operating online you will have no shortage of choice when it comes to finding a suitable provider and plan for your needs. The Internet provides a huge amount of choice for those who want to find the ideal auto insurance plan for their needs at a price that they can afford
• Great value for money: You will find some great deals on the cost of your auto insurance cover when you use the Internet, which means that you will be able to get cover at a very affordable price that is within your budget without having to compromise on the level of cover that you take out
• Being able to check policies with ease: In addition to comparing the cost of cover it is also very important to compare the different plans and work out just what you will get for your money with each of the insurance plans that you are considering. Using the internet makes this a very fast and simple process, as you can check the details of all the policies you are considering with ease
• Being able to shop around: Comparing cover is an important part of finding the right auto insurance plan, and when you go online you can shop around with speed and ease, making it easier to find the best plan for your needs and budget

This year has shown many people who live inland just what it’s like when a hurricane or tropical storm comes their way. Up to now, it’s mostly been the folk living on the coasts that have had the joy of watching a hurricane dismantle their towns and cities. Now the folk who live up in the hills of Vermont are learning to live with the consequences. These range from the simple jobs of repairing roads and those picturesque wooden bridges, to the grisly tasks of trying to find the dead bodies that have been washed out of cemeteries. Following Katrina, there was considerable hysteria, and not only among people living on the coasts who were finally forced to confront the reality of angry nature. There was also panic in the boardrooms of the insurers. Although there had been regular hurricanes and storms, these companies had managed to remain profitable. But if claims on the scale seen in Mississippi were to become more common, they could all be wiped out. The result was seen in two very distinct changes. The first was to fight a higher percentage of claims. Indeed, many have criticized the ethics shown by some insurers who pay claims adjusters bonuses for avoiding payment of claims or agreeing very low settlements.

The second set of changes has been seen in the policies where many terms have been completely rewritten to exclude or limit the claims that can be made. The first obvious signs have been in the definition of the deductible. The majority of insurers used to rely on a fixed amount. This has changed over to requiring policyholders to pay a percentage of the home’s insured value as the deductible. The percentages range from 1 to 5%. So, if you have a home with a low value, you could find yourself required to pay a higher percentage. High-value home owners might “only” have to pay 1 or 2% for every claim. Obviously, insurers have not agreed standard terms so, as you drive down a street, every home might have a different deductible depending on which insurer writes their policy.

Did you know eighteen states allow the insurers to change the deductible depending on the definition of the weather event? This leads to a higher deductible for hurricanes than for other storms. So the big question is how to define a hurricane. Sadly, there’s no agreement. Some insurers wait until a storm is named by the National Hurricane Center, others have different guidelines depending on the amount of rain that falls and/or the strength of the wind. In the same neighborhood, this can lead to different deductibles and different approaches to deciding whether to accept the claims. To deal with this problem, some of the Insurance Commissioners have introduced new regulations. In Connecticut, no insurer will be allowed to impose a higher deductible if the winds consistently exceed 74 mph over a set period of time. In states where similar rules have been introduced, the insurers retaliated by requiring policyholders to pay out-of-pocket expenses. As home insurance companies find their profits under pressure, they turn to other means to recover their profit. It’s a vicious circle and unless Insurance Commissioners step in more forcefully, home insurance policies will become unaffordable when hurricanes are in the wind.

We’re all used to the idea of black boxes from the airplane industry. If there’s a crash, investigators are quickly on the scene to recover the boxes. They give the first insights into the cause of the crash and, hopefully, when the investigation is complete, safety can be improved. Everyone wants planes to be as safe as possible. Well, the same is true of auto design. Thanks to big government, working through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), every new vehicle is leaving the assembly line with an event data recorder (EDR) inside (for those who like details, it’s usually under the driver’s seat). An EDR is designed to work in exactly the same was as an airplane black box except it doesn’t record the conversations inside the vehicle. It’s wired into all the major onboard systems and continuously records everything happening in the vehicle while it’s in motion. If there’s a crash, it holds the last minute of activity in a permanent recording.

At present, each manufacturer is allowed to produce their own design of recorder although the nature of the information to be collected is standardized. As from 2013, all the manufacturers must use the design produced by the NHTSA to collect a very wide range of data including all the changes in speed immediately before the crash, whether the driver was braking, and so on. The declared intention in collecting all this information is to allow the NHTSA to collect standardized data from all crash incidents. Should patterns emerge, it will be easier to identify design and manufacturing problems and, after consultation with the manufacturers, to modify the designs to produce safer vehicles. In this, the initial intention is to treat the information as mere statistical data, i.e. not identify the source vehicles or drivers.

But this is not the intention of the other interested parties. Although the NHTSA guidelines transfer ownership of the data to the owner of the vehicle, the majority of insurers have written a clause into their policies giving the owner’s consent to accessing the EDR data following an accident. So, if your explanation of the accident given in the claim does not match the recording, this can trigger either a refusal of the claim or, in the more obvious cases of fraud, a police investigation. For example, if people were to claim their cars keep accelerating and will not slow down, the EDR will supply clear evidence of whether the brakes were actually applied. This has nothing to do with the computer systems that collect data for the pay-as-you-drive policies. But both systems could save you money in the medium- to long-term.

When you get your next auto insurance quotes, check whether there are pay-as-you-drive options. If so, there are good discounts if you are a low-mileage driver. More generally, the information from the EDRs offers insurers the chance to reduce the amount of fraud. At present, this is costing the insurance industry billions of dollars a year. If we encourage the insurers to check every large claim against the information from the EDR, this could end up saving us dollars when the next round of auto insurance quotes comes in assuming, of course, the insurers pass on their savings by reducing the premium rates.

There are times when governments change the law and you can see the benefit to the public. So, for example, we all approve a change to give more protection to children and the other more vulnerable members of society, but we would object to laws that give advantages only to a small percentage of the population – social justice usually requires equal treatment under the law for all. Coming back to insurance, there’s a generally accepted principle of financial responsibility that, if you decide to drive, you should carry a minimum amount of insurance. That way, should there damage to property or personal injuries, the driver at fault can pay some or all the cost of repairs and medical treatment. In most states, this insurance is mandatory. You’ll commit an offense if you drive without a valid policy in place. Better still, the majority of states are reviewing the mandated minimum amounts and increasing them. Often these minimums were set twenty and more years ago. Over time, you get inflation and this reduces the buying power of the dollar. What was a big sum of money twenty yeas ago, is loose change today. It makes sense to increase the minimums in line with inflation.

Except, many states refuse this simple step and allow the minimum amounts to become ever more worthless. The reason? When you’ve not increased the amount for twenty years (and more), it would take a big increase to catch up. Most elected politicians therefore refuse any increase now that times are bad or only allow a small increase like 5%. Now let’s go to Wisconsin. Here the brave politicians have decided they want your votes when the next election comes, so they have just reduced the minimum amounts. As from November 1, 2011 the minimums will drop from 50/100/15 to 25/50/10. If the insurers do the right thing and pass on the savings to all you lucky policyholders, you’ll be paying less for your auto insurance over the next year.

Interestingly, this change is part of a more general package to reform insurance cover in Wisconsin and, if you live there, you should realize many of these changes will make it more difficult to claim. For example, it used to be mandatory to carry both uninsured and underinsured motorist cover. Now underinsured cover is your choice. Consider carefully before you decide not to renew. As the law stands today, should a bad driver hit you and not be carrying enough cover to pay all your expenses, your own policy will pay the difference. After November 1, you could decide you’ll pay any additional losses out of your own pocket. In addition to the deductible, this could make an accident very expensive to you personally even though you were not at fault. There are also changes to the law on reducing clauses so that, if you’re entitled to claim disability benefit or under any other policy, the amount of your auto insurance claim is now reduced by those amounts.

Auto insurance quotes rarely come with a copy of the policy. Before you sign up, you should read through all the small print. If you live in Wisconsin, you may find it useful either to talk to an attorney or carefully research the changes to the law before you renew.